[SWFObject] Multiple includes of SWFObject cause onunload recursion error

[M.A. Turner]

Thanks Geoff. Works great. SWFObject in conjunction with SWFResize  
(http://blog.pixelbreaker.com/flash/swfforcesize/) make my life worth  
living. Thanks for the hard work. Also, if you could muster up the  
courage to make your own Resize script that let's us all use a  
DOCTYPE in Firefox (so we can validate on W3C) I would send you a  
gift, a card and some roses. I know validation is useless but the  
clients like it.

Love & Machine Guns,

_
	
	M.A. Turner
	Standards / Motion / Audio
	Typeism™
	mat at typeism.com
	423.903.1780
	aim: typeism
_	







On Dec 7, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Geoff Stearns wrote:

> so one of the last few comments on the blog post mention reversing
> the cleanup order - so it cleans them up from the bottom up.
>
> i've made the change in the preview release of swfobject and put it
> up into SVN...
>
> i'm also changing the version from 2.0 to 1.5 as i'm not really
> making too many changes to it... so those of you that are using the
> 2.0 preview release should grab this update (i'll be updating the
> preview folder as well in a bit)
>
> grab the test version here:
>
> http://svn.deconcept.com/swfobject/trunk/
>
> let me know how this works out for everyone.
>
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Liam Clancy wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> its mentioned on the blog post for the latest version (1.4.4) that:
>>
>> http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/08/03/swfobject-144-released/
>>
>>   "One new issue that can arise with the addition of the cleanup
>> routines, is if you are including the swfobject.js script in your
>> pages more than once, you will cause more ‘out of memory’ errors. If
>> this happens, make sure you only insert the swfobject.js file in your
>> page only one time."
>>
>> Seems a reasonable enough workaround for the present, but is this
>> planned to be fixed?
>>
>> Its seems to me that if Opensource projects, Ad networks, CMS and
>> others are indicating that they are using SWFObject then users will
>> be unable to determine in advance whether SWF is going to be present
>> on their site already - which could start getting it a bad name,
>> since this causes such visible errors.
>>
>> Has anyone a working alternative?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Liam Clancy (metafeather)
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
>>
>> iD8DBQFFdwYA46zF/4a4ZHcRAtZeAJkBBgIlHPtprkI5HskQ4gnexpDLWwCeJfXB
>> VjzGsU+tVEwSUBvgifQ2ILo=
>> =Rufz
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> SWFObject mailing list
>> SWFObject at lists.deconcept.com
>> http://lists.deconcept.com/listinfo.cgi/swfobject-deconcept.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> SWFObject mailing list
> SWFObject at lists.deconcept.com
> http://lists.deconcept.com/listinfo.cgi/swfobject-deconcept.com
>

_
	
	M.A. Turner
	Standards / Motion / Audio
	Typeism™
	mat at typeism.com
	423.903.1780
	aim: typeism
_	



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deconcept.com/pipermail/swfobject-deconcept.com/attachments/20061207/eae45bbb/attachment-0005.htm>