[SWFObject] swfobject.js vs. swfobject_source.js

[Geoff Stearns]

they are both functionally identical... the compressed one just has  
some newlines and whitespace stripped out, and some variable names  
shortened... (it uses the dojo shrinksafe tool)

so you can use either one, but i suggest the compressed version as  
that one is smaller so your users will download it faster and will  
cost you less bandwidth in the long run.




On Oct 15, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Sighvatur Jónsson wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm new to SWFObject, and was just wondering what's the main  
> difference in functionality between the two .js files  
> 'swfobject.js' and 'swfobject_source.js'.
>
> In the readme file I can see that 'swfobject.js' is a compressed  
> file, and looking through the code I see a difference around 100  
> lines. But since I'm not that much of a JavaScript coder I've been  
> looking for some info regarding the main difference between those  
> files.
>
> For example if I we're to use ExpressIntall, is it then recommended  
> to use the longer file 'swfobject_source.js'?
>
> Best regards,
> Sigva
> »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
> Sighvatur Jónsson
> Multimediadesigner, Danmark
> _______________________________________________
> SWFObject mailing list
> SWFObject at lists.deconcept.com
> http://lists.deconcept.com/listinfo.cgi/swfobject-deconcept.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deconcept.com/pipermail/swfobject-deconcept.com/attachments/20061031/1e20ca5d/attachment-0005.htm>